In Chapter One of Guringai, GuriNgai, Wannangini, Walkaloa: A long con, gone on too long, I wrote “I am 100% confident Mr Warren Whitfield cobbled together his pseudo-Aboriginal narrative using a variety of non-Aboriginal academic’s work, and am willing to accept Mr Whitfield’s admission that Historian Keith Vincent Smith was one such victim.”
Well the following video, recorded on the 9th of August 2011 is of Dr Keith Vincent Smith speaking on Bungaree. What caught my attention right towards the end Dr Smith recalls his discussion with pseudo-Aboriginal man Warren Whitfield regarding Whitfield supposed ancestral connection to my Ancestor Bungaree.
So Dr Keith Vincent Smith has a very different understanding than the one put forward by Warren Whitfield.
But in the 2001 interview with Warren Whitfield by Rosemary Block, recorded at the State Library of New South Wales on Friday 7 September of that year.
Whitfield told Rosemary Block the following:

At this point is anyone shocked?
Well we know now.
Add to this the fact that Dr Natalie Kwok was unable to contact ‘GuriNgai” founder, Mr Warren Whitfield, when attempting to conduct her anthropological study of his family.
Dr Lawrence Paul Allen was denied access to Dr Kwok’s earlier work, and was forced to rely on Warren Whitfield’s account.

Which we know to be demonstrably false, right down to misidentifying the photographs of his own family.

Yet they persist.
Why would the GuriNgai or whatever they are calling themselves today let the truth get in the way, and why on earth would they start to hold themselves accountable now?
Leave a reply to Warren Whitfield Cancel reply