The “GuriNgai” controversy concerns a disproven, modern, psuedo-Aboriginal identity that has been adopted by non-Aboriginal people and organisations across Northern Sydney, Hornsby Shire, and the Central Coast of New South Wales.
At its centre is a serious question: how did a group with zero legitimate cultural and historical foundations come to be widely accepted by councils, schools, cultural organisations, environmental groups, and other public institutions as somehow representing Aboriginal People and Culture?
The modern use of the term “GuriNgai” can be traced to the work of missionary John Fraser. In 1892, Fraser took the genuine Aboriginal name of the Guringai/Gringai/Guringay people, whose Country is north of the Hunter River, and adapted it to a speculative “Kuring-gai tribe.”
Later researchers found little evidence that this supposed tribe existed as Fraser described it. Wafer and Lissarrague (2010) found no reliable early record of a “Kuringgai” people in the Sydney region. More recent linguistic research places the Guringai/Gringai/Guringay people in the Barrington and Dungog region, north of the Hunter River, where they speak a dialect of Gathang distinct from the Aboriginal languages of the Sydney Basin (Lissarrague & Syron, 2024). The Aboriginal Heritage Office also concluded that Kuringgai and GuriNgai was nothing more than a poorly supported label adopted by local councils without sufficient consultation with recognised Aboriginal people and communities (Aboriginal Heritage Office, 2015).
This confusion created an opportunity for individuals and organisations to present themselves as representatives of the Northern Sydney “GuriNgai” people. In 2003, Warren Whitfield established the Guringai Tribal Link Aboriginal Corporation and promoted claims of descent from the well-known Aboriginal couple Bungaree and Matora. These claims relied heavily on a proposed family connection through Sophy and Charlotte Ashby. Subsequent archival and genealogical research has challenged that connection and found that it is not supported by the available historical evidence. The terms “GuriNgai,” “Wannangini,” “Walkaloa,” and “Wanabee” are names that have been used by substantially overlapping individuals, families, organisations, and associates within the same non-Aboriginal network to claim cultural authority across different areas and institutional settings.
The controversy has also appeared in cultural works, including the film Nyaa Wa, which repeated the contested genealogy connecting the Ashby family to Bungaree. Community advocacy and further historical research have since led to some corrections, including the removal of “Guringai” from certain National Parks and Wildlife Service signs in 2021.
We ask institutions to continue the process of correcting inaccurate information, consult recognised Aboriginal people and Local Aboriginal Land Councils, and explain openly how earlier mistakes occurred.
We ask the so-called authorities to ensure our rights are upheld and respected.
The evidence reviewed by Aboriginal people, community, researchers, linguists, statutory bodies, and the historical Guringay community north of the Hunter River does not support treating the GuriNgai, Wannangini, Walkaloa, or Wanabee labels as traditional peoples, nor does it support describing Northern Sydney, Hornsby Shire, or the Central Coast as “GuriNgai Country.”
Restoring integrity requires truth telling, institutional accountability, and respect for Aboriginal communities with genuine historical, genealogical, cultural, and community-recognised connections to Country.
Chapter 13. 2023 – Post publication of A Long Con Gone On Too Long.
Addendum. ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONNECTION REPORT: Family history and contemporary connection evidence.
Addendum. A new perspective on Laurence Paul Allen’s thesis.
Addendum. Goolabeen – Saving Kariong ‘Sacred Lands’
Contact the author using the contact form below. If you would like, it’s entirely up to you.
A Long Con, Gone on Too Long. 